XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L
XLYP.L (Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLYP.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLYP.L returned 13.68%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLYP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLYP.L achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLYP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 13.68%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLYP.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- 10.71%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF | -2.69% | 0.23% | 30.67% | 32.31% | -26.14% | 30.65% | 22.15% | 24.16% | 6.23% | 11.28% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLYP.L and SPXP.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XLYP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLYP.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLYP.L
SPXP.L
Technology
XLYP.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLYP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLYP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLYP.L
SPXP.L
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLYP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.52 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 4.11 | -3.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 15.13 | -12.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLYP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.78 | -2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.06 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 1.10 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.15 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLYP.L drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLYP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -25.46% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -7.09% | -5.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.52% | -20.77% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | -20.77% | -9.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | -25.46% | -4.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -0.21% | -6.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -3.50% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 1.93% | +2.67% |
Volatility
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLYP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLYP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 2.65% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 7.24% | +4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 10.49% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 14.23% | +6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 16.22% | +3.64% |
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLYP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLYP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLYP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLYP.L.
XLYP.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLYP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLYP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer