PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLYP.L achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLYP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 13.68%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.


XLYP.L

1D
0.33%
1M
0.28%
YTD
-2.69%
6M
-1.86%
1Y
10.71%
3Y*
12.55%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
13.68%

SPXP.L

1D
0.00%
1M
4.48%
YTD
10.55%
6M
9.96%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLYP.L
Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF
-2.69%0.23%30.67%32.31%-26.14%30.65%22.15%24.16%6.23%11.28%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.53%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XLYP.L and SPXP.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.72

The correlation between XLYP.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLYP.L
SPXP.L

Consumer Cyclical

98.8%
10.1%

Technology

1.0%
35.6%

Industrials

0.2%
8.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XLYP.L
98.8%
SPXP.L
10.1%

Technology

XLYP.L
1.0%
SPXP.L
35.6%

Industrials

XLYP.L
0.2%
SPXP.L
8.3%

Basic Materials

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
1.8%

Communication Services

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
4.9%

Energy

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
3.5%

Financial Services

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
11.8%

Healthcare

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
8.5%

Real Estate

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
1.9%

Utilities

XLYP.L

-

SPXP.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLYP.L
XLYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYP.LSPXP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.52

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

4.11

-3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.32

15.13

-12.81

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLYP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLYP.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYP.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.78

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.06

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.10

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

1.15

-0.40

Drawdowns

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLYP.L drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYP.L and SPXP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYP.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.40%

-25.46%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.73%

-7.09%

-5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.52%

-20.77%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.40%

-20.77%

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

-25.46%

-4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.66%

-0.21%

-6.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.54%

-3.50%

-3.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

1.93%

+2.67%

Volatility

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLYP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYP.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

2.65%

+2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

7.24%

+4.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

10.49%

+5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

14.23%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

16.22%

+3.64%

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLYP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLYP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLYP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLYP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLYP.L.

XLYP.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLYP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLYP.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer