XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L
XLYP.L (Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF) and FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLYP.L is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while FWRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XLYP.L returned 11.03% vs 31.42% for FWRG.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLYP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRG.L.
Performance
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLYP.L is traded in GBp, while FWRG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLYP.L achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly lower than FWRG.L's 12.37% return.
XLYP.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.68%
FWRG.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 12.37%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 31.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLYP.L Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF | -2.69% | 0.23% | 30.67% | 6.62% |
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc | 12.34% | 5.73% | 22.20% | 7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLYP.L and FWRG.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between XLYP.L and FWRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLYP.L
FWRG.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLYP.L
FWRG.L
Technology
XLYP.L
FWRG.L
Industrials
XLYP.L
FWRG.L
Basic Materials
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Communication Services
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Consumer Defensive
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Energy
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Financial Services
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Healthcare
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Real Estate
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Utilities
XLYP.L
-
FWRG.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLYP.L
FWRG.L
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLYP.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.44 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 4.66 | -3.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 12.24 | -9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLYP.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 2.46 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.10 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLYP.L drawdown since its inception was -30.40%, which is greater than FWRG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYP.L and FWRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLYP.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.40% | -22.64% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -6.70% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.66% | -0.07% | -6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.54% | -4.29% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.60% | 2.55% | +2.05% |
Volatility
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Consumer Discretionary Sector UCITS ETF (XLYP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) at 3.51%. This indicates that XLYP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLYP.L | FWRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 3.51% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 9.17% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 12.70% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 14.75% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 14.75% | +5.11% |
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLYP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLYP.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLYP.L nor FWRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLYP.L and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLYP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLYP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRG.L.
XLYP.L is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FWRG.L is Global Equities. XLYP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLYP.L and 0.15% for FWRG.L.
Find the right allocation for XLYP.L and FWRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer