XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and XLVS.L (Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds from Invesco - XLVP.L tracks the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD while XLVS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L returned 9.99%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for XLVS.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.14% expense ratio.

Performance

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLVP.L is traded in GBp, while XLVS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLVS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than XLVS.L's -1.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLVP.L having a 9.99% annualized return and XLVS.L not far behind at 9.98%.

XLVP.L

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 3.80%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

XLVS.L

• 1D: 3.00%
• 1M: 5.76%
• YTD: -1.70%
• 6M: -1.27%
• 1Y: 16.24%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: 9.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF	-1.84%	6.91%	3.77%	-3.87%	8.97%	29.14%	8.22%	16.79%	10.30%	11.00%
XLVS.L Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc	-1.70%	6.60%	3.94%	-3.52%	8.96%	28.78%	8.75%	15.96%	10.49%	11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XLVP.L and XLVS.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014	0.94

The correlation between XLVP.L and XLVS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLVP.L	XLVS.L
Healthcare	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLVP.L

XLVP.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XLVP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLVP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

XLVS.L

XLVS.L Risk / Return Rank: 28
XLVS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XLVS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XLVS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
XLVS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XLVS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLVP.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.04	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.59	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.18	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.39	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	3.46	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the XLVS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLVP.L and XLVS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLVP.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.04	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.46	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.61	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.70	+0.01

Drawdowns

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, smaller than the maximum XLVS.L drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and XLVS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLVP.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-24.30%	+4.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-11.67%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.67%	-19.70%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.67%	-19.70%	+0.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.67%	-19.70%	+0.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-5.07%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-4.78%	+0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	4.68%	-0.11%

Volatility

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Invesco Health Care S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLVS.L) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLVP.L	XLVS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	5.57%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	11.37%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.76%	15.57%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	15.06%	-0.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	16.42%	-0.57%

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLVP.L and XLVS.L have an expense ratio of 0.14%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLVP.L vs. XLVS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLVP.L nor XLVS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLVP.L and XLVS.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, XLVP.L and XLVS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XLVP.L or XLVS.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.14% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLVP.L or XLVS.L?

XLVP.L and XLVS.L have the same expense ratio: 0.14% per year.

What is the main difference between XLVP.L and XLVS.L?

XLVP.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while XLVS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Health Care Index.