XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and HLTW.L (Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L returned 9.99%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for HLTW.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLVP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HLTW.L.

Performance

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLVP.L is traded in GBp, while HLTW.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HLTW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than HLTW.L's -2.73% return. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L has outperformed HLTW.L with an annualized return of 9.99%, while HLTW.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.

XLVP.L

• 1D: 3.10%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: -1.13%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 3.80%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: 9.99%

HLTW.L

• 1D: 3.02%
• 1M: 3.83%
• YTD: -2.73%
• 6M: -2.54%
• 1Y: 12.62%
• 3Y*: 2.64%
• 5Y*: 5.42%
• 10Y*: 8.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF	-1.84%	6.91%	3.77%	-3.87%	8.97%	29.14%	8.22%	16.79%	10.30%	11.00%
HLTW.L Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD	-2.73%	7.49%	2.14%	-2.07%	5.56%	21.73%	9.62%	18.18%	7.56%	9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XLVP.L and HLTW.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014	0.90

The correlation between XLVP.L and HLTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLVP.L

XLVP.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XLVP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XLVP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
XLVP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 27

HLTW.L

HLTW.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
HLTW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HLTW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
HLTW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
HLTW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
HLTW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLVP.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.86	+0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.35	+0.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.16	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.20	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.56	3.11	+0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the HLTW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLVP.L and HLTW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLVP.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	0.86	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.39	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.55	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.80	-0.10

Drawdowns

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, roughly equal to the maximum HLTW.L drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and HLTW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLVP.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.67%	-18.93%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.56%	-10.46%	-1.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.67%	-18.93%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.67%	-18.93%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.67%	-18.93%	-0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-5.86%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.62%	-4.37%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.57%	4.06%	+0.51%

Volatility

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and Lyxor UCITS MSCI World Health Care TR C-USD (HLTW.L) have volatilities of 5.43% and 5.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLVP.L	HLTW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	5.30%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.54%	10.89%	-0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.76%	14.60%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.25%	14.02%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.85%	15.37%	+0.48%

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HLTW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLVP.L vs. HLTW.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLVP.L nor HLTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLVP.L and HLTW.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, XLVP.L and HLTW.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XLVP.L or HLTW.L?

On fees, XLVP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLVP.L or HLTW.L?

XLVP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HLTW.L.

What is the main difference between XLVP.L and HLTW.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLVP.L and 0.30% for HLTW.L.