PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HLTH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLVP.L is traded in GBp, while HLTH.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HLTH.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVP.L achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly higher than HLTH.L's -2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XLVP.L has outperformed HLTH.L with an annualized return of 9.99%, while HLTH.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.17% annualized return.


XLVP.L

1D
3.10%
1M
5.91%
YTD
-1.84%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
16.32%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
9.99%

HLTH.L

1D
3.24%
1M
1.76%
YTD
-2.18%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
9.01%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLVP.L
Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
-1.84%6.91%3.77%-3.87%8.97%29.14%8.22%16.79%10.30%11.00%
HLTH.L
SPDR® MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF
-2.18%12.73%-0.59%5.46%1.19%17.85%3.79%23.18%0.54%7.83%

Correlation

The correlation between XLVP.L and HLTH.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2014

0.65

The correlation between XLVP.L and HLTH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLVP.L
HLTH.L

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XLVP.L
100.0%
HLTH.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Communication Services

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Energy

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Financial Services

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Industrials

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Real Estate

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Technology

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Utilities

XLVP.L

-

HLTH.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLVP.L
XLVP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLVP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

HLTH.L
HLTH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HLTH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLTH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLTH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HLTH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLTH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) and SPDR® MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HLTH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLVP.LHLTH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.11

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.67

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

1.60

+1.97

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLVP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the HLTH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLVP.L and HLTH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVP.LHLTH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

0.54

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.38

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.45

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Drawdowns

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.67%, smaller than the maximum HLTH.L drawdown of -25.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVP.L and HLTH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVP.LHLTH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.67%

-25.51%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.56%

-13.42%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

-25.51%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.67%

-25.51%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.67%

-25.51%

+5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.97%

-10.58%

+5.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.62%

-6.78%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

5.63%

-1.06%

Volatility

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) is 5.43%, while SPDR® MSCI Europe Health Care UCITS ETF (HLTH.L) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that XLVP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLTH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVP.LHLTH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.43%

5.88%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.54%

12.13%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

16.75%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.25%

15.68%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.85%

16.03%

-0.18%

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than HLTH.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLVP.L vs. HLTH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLVP.L nor HLTH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XLVP.L and HLTH.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for HLTH.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLVP.L and 0.18% for HLTH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLVP.L and HLTH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer