PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 9.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has outperformed XLP with an annualized return of 10.01%, while XLP has yielded a comparatively lower 7.51% annualized return.


XLV

1D
1.41%
1M
1.98%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
10.01%

XLP

1D
1.87%
1M
-0.59%
YTD
9.13%
6M
9.37%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
7.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.85%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
9.13%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and XLP is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.57

The correlation between XLV and XLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLV vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
XLP

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

99.0%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

XLV

-

XLP

-

Communication Services

XLV

-

XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

XLP
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

XLP
99.0%

Energy

XLV

-

XLP

-

Financial Services

XLV

-

XLP

-

Industrials

XLV

-

XLP

-

Real Estate

XLV

-

XLP

-

Technology

XLV

-

XLP

-

Utilities

XLV

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLVXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.08

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

0.59

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

1.12

+2.77

XLV vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLV vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-35.90%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-9.69%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-12.39%

-4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-16.30%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-24.51%

-3.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-5.82%

+1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-7.06%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

5.09%

-0.67%

Volatility

XLV vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 5.27% and 5.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

5.13%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

10.52%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.09%

13.13%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

13.36%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

14.77%

+1.80%

XLV vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLV and XLP have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLV vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than XLP's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.62%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.66%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and XLP have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLV has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to XLP (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 10-year performance, XLV leads with 10.01% vs 7.51% for XLP. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLV has performed better with a 10.01% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV and XLP have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.66% for XLV.

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer