PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 10.01%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.


XLV

1D
1.41%
1M
1.98%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
10.01%

XLK

1D
-4.14%
1M
2.23%
YTD
28.25%
6M
26.51%
1Y
52.47%
3Y*
30.61%
5Y*
21.34%
10Y*
25.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.85%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.25%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and XLK is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between XLV and XLK has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLV vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLV
XLK

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

99.7%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

XLV
100.0%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

XLV

-

XLK

-

Communication Services

XLV

-

XLK

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLV

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

XLV

-

XLK

-

Energy

XLV

-

XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

XLV

-

XLK

-

Industrials

XLV

-

XLK
0.1%

Real Estate

XLV

-

XLK

-

Technology

XLV

-

XLK
99.7%

Utilities

XLV

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLVXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

3.31

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

10.56

-6.67

XLV vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-82.05%

+42.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-15.92%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-25.66%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-33.56%

+16.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-33.56%

+5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-6.96%

+2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-34.90%

+27.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

4.98%

-0.56%

Volatility

XLV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 5.27%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 12.51%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

12.51%

-7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

19.70%

-9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.09%

23.48%

-8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.77%

25.37%

-10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.57%

24.71%

-8.14%

XLV vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLV and XLK have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.43%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.66%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and XLK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to XLV (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.48% vs 10.01% for XLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.48% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLV and XLK have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.43% for XLK.

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLK is Technology Equities. XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer