XLV vs. UNHW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. XLV is passively managed, while UNHW is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for UNHW.

Performance

XLV vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than UNHW's 22.06% return.

XLV

• 1D: 3.07%
• 1M: 4.67%
• YTD: -1.35%
• 6M: -0.35%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 6.92%
• 5Y*: 6.19%
• 10Y*: 9.48%

UNHW

• 1D: 6.07%
• 1M: 10.36%
• YTD: 22.06%
• 6M: 20.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	-1.35%	0.24%
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	22.06%	-3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and UNHW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.39

XLV vs. UNHW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLV	UNHW
Healthcare	100.0%	33.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLV vs. UNHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV

XLV Risk / Return Rank: 31
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 29
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLV	UNHW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.73	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLV	UNHW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.81	-0.34

Drawdowns

XLV vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, which is greater than UNHW's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and UNHW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLV	UNHW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.17%	-32.28%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.68%	-1.42%	-3.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-12.40%	+5.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.33%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLV	UNHW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.97%	50.32%	-35.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.76%	50.32%	-35.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.57%	50.32%	-33.75%

XLV vs. UNHW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than UNHW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLV vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than UNHW's 16.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF	16.34%	2.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.65%	1.60%	1.67%	1.59%	1.47%	1.33%	1.49%	2.17%	1.57%	1.47%	1.60%	1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLV and UNHW in my portfolio?

XLV and UNHW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLV or UNHW?

On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLV or UNHW?

XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UNHW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLV or UNHW?

UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 16.34%, compared with 1.65% for XLV.

What is the main difference between XLV and UNHW?

XLV is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLV and 0.99% for UNHW.