PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLV vs. MCD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLV vs. MCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than MCD's -5.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of 9.81%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.


XLV

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.90%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
0.67%
1Y
15.00%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
9.81%

MCD

1D
0.01%
1M
4.28%
YTD
-5.66%
6M
-8.96%
1Y
-3.37%
3Y*
1.94%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLV vs. MCD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.23%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
-5.66%7.89%0.14%15.06%0.51%27.79%11.30%13.97%5.78%45.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XLV and MCD is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLV vs. MCD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

MCD
MCD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLV vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLVMCDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.98

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

-0.20

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

-0.50

+3.82

XLV vs. MCD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the MCD Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLV and MCD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLV vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and MCD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVMCDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.17%

-73.20%

+34.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.47%

-19.05%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.11%

-19.05%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-19.05%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-36.90%

+8.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-15.46%

+11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-14.89%

+7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

7.53%

-3.16%

Volatility

XLV vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD) have volatilities of 4.90% and 4.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVMCDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

4.96%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

12.20%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

16.62%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

17.27%

-2.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

20.40%

-3.82%

Dividends

XLV vs. MCD - Dividend Comparison

XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than MCD's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCD
McDonald's Corporation
2.58%2.35%2.34%2.10%2.15%1.96%2.35%2.39%2.36%2.23%2.97%2.91%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.63%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLV and MCD have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCD has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs MCD's -73.20%.

XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLV and MCD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer