PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLUI vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLUI vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLUI achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than FFUT's 13.58% return.


XLUI

1D
-0.50%
1M
-1.79%
6M
6.47%
YTD
8.22%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.49%

FFUT

1D
-0.23%
1M
5.46%
6M
9.55%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
23.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.77M$4.00M$2.01M
$811.48K$735.97K$652.13K

XLUI vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLUI and FFUT is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLUI vs. FFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLUI
XLUI Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
XLUI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUI Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FFUT
FFUT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLUI vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUIFFUTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.38

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

4.20

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

14.36

-10.97

XLUI vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLUI Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the FFUT Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLUI and FFUT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLUI vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLUI drawdown since its inception was -6.01%, which is greater than FFUT's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLUI and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUIFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-5.59%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-5.59%

-0.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-1.43%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-1.11%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.63%

+0.88%

Volatility

XLUI vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLUI) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) at 3.61%. This indicates that XLUI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUIFFUTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

3.61%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

9.27%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

11.67%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.30%

11.09%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

11.09%

+0.21%

XLUI vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLUI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLUI vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

XLUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.00%, more than FFUT's 1.84% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLUI and FFUT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLUI has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to FFUT (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLUI dropped -6.01% vs FFUT's -5.59%.

On 1-year performance, FFUT leads with 23.75% vs 8.36% for XLUI. On fees, XLUI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FFUT has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFUT has performed better with a 23.75% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLUI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

XLUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.00%, compared with 1.84% for FFUT.

XLUI is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLUI and 0.80% for FFUT.

FFUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLUI and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer