XLU vs. ZAP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP).

XLU and ZAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLU is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Utilities Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. ZAP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024. Both XLU and ZAP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XLU vs. ZAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XLU vs. ZAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund	8.25%	16.03%	1.91%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	10.67%	21.84%	1.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than ZAP's 10.67% return.

XLU

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -3.18%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 6.77%
• 1Y: 19.71%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 10.80%
• 10Y*: 9.74%

ZAP

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 9.86%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. ZAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

ZAP

Global X U.S. Electrification ETF

XLU

Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund

Return for Risk

XLU vs. ZAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 71
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 67
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ZAP

ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. ZAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLU	ZAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.07	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.71	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.37	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	3.99	-1.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.51	11.91	-6.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLU vs. ZAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the ZAP Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and ZAP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLU	ZAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	2.07	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.69	-1.28

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and ZAP is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XLU vs. ZAP - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than ZAP's 1.64% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLU Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund	2.59%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	1.64%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XLU vs. ZAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than ZAP's maximum drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and ZAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	ZAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-12.38%	-39.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-8.59%	-0.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-3.71%	+0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-2.67%	-7.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	2.88%	+0.94%

Volatility

XLU vs. ZAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) is 5.09%, while Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	ZAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.40%	-0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.35%	10.77%	-0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.82%	16.07%	-0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.18%	16.55%	+0.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	16.55%	+2.66%