PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 11.45% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed VBR with an annualized return of 8.99%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


XLU

1D
-1.87%
1M
-2.68%
YTD
2.66%
6M
3.35%
1Y
10.26%
3Y*
12.85%
5Y*
9.10%
10Y*
8.99%

VBR

1D
0.16%
1M
0.48%
YTD
11.45%
6M
12.14%
1Y
24.85%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.78%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.66%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
11.45%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and VBR is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.46

The correlation between XLU and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLU vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
VBR

Utilities

100.0%
4.8%

Basic Materials

-

6.3%

Communication Services

-

2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.0%

Energy

-

5.2%

Financial Services

-

17.6%

Healthcare

-

7.9%

Industrials

-

18.1%

Real Estate

-

10.1%

Technology

-

10.6%

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
VBR
4.8%

Basic Materials

XLU

-

VBR
6.3%

Communication Services

XLU

-

VBR
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

VBR
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

VBR
4.0%

Energy

XLU

-

VBR
5.2%

Financial Services

XLU

-

VBR
17.6%

Healthcare

XLU

-

VBR
7.9%

Industrials

XLU

-

VBR
18.1%

Real Estate

XLU

-

VBR
10.1%

Technology

XLU

-

VBR
10.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLUVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.82

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.47

9.94

-7.47

XLU vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLUVBRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.65

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.40

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.42

-0.02

Drawdowns

XLU vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-61.98%

+10.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-8.85%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-24.19%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-24.19%

-1.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-45.28%

+9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.18%

-0.95%

-7.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-8.26%

-1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

2.51%

+1.65%

Volatility

XLU vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.67%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

3.67%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.70%

10.49%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

15.16%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

19.77%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

21.74%

-2.47%

XLU vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than VBR's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.76%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.73%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and VBR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to VBR (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, VBR leads with 10.50% vs 8.99% for XLU. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VBR has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 8.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.76% for VBR.

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.05% for VBR.

VBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer