PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLU vs. UTIL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLU is traded in USD, while UTIL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the UTIL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than UTIL.L's 13.81% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed UTIL.L with an annualized return of 9.20%, while UTIL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.78% annualized return.


XLU

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.48%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.20%

UTIL.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.62%
YTD
13.81%
6M
16.75%
1Y
27.99%
3Y*
20.12%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
11.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.04%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
13.81%51.98%-4.93%16.67%-12.37%0.89%21.72%26.80%-1.46%24.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and UTIL.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014

0.34

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLU
UTIL.L

Utilities

100.0%
95.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XLU
100.0%
UTIL.L
95.4%

Basic Materials

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Communication Services

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Energy

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Financial Services

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Healthcare

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Industrials

XLU

-

UTIL.L
4.6%

Real Estate

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Technology

XLU

-

UTIL.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLU vs. UTIL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

UTIL.L
UTIL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTIL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLUUTIL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.10

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

8.56

-5.76

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the UTIL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and UTIL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than UTIL.L's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and UTIL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLUUTIL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.98%

-35.43%

-16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-8.98%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.26%

-17.76%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

-33.85%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-35.43%

-0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-4.16%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-8.23%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.25%

3.26%

+0.99%

Volatility

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.59%, while SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF (UTIL.L) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTIL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLUUTIL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.89%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

14.06%

-2.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.66%

16.69%

-2.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

19.10%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

19.55%

-0.28%

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than UTIL.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLU vs. UTIL.L - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while UTIL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UTIL.L
SPDR MSCI Europe Utilities UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.67%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLU and UTIL.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for UTIL.L.

XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while UTIL.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.18% for UTIL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLU and UTIL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer