XLU vs. SOBO.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while SOBO.TO (South Bow Corp) is a stock. Over the past year, XLU returned 12.50% vs 51.18% for SOBO.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLU is traded in USD, while SOBO.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SOBO.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than SOBO.TO's 40.47% return.

XLU

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 1.50%
• YTD: 5.04%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: 12.50%
• 3Y*: 13.79%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 9.20%

SOBO.TO

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 2.17%
• YTD: 40.47%
• 6M: 44.56%
• 1Y: 51.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	5.04%	16.03%	-4.32%
SOBO.TO South Bow Corp	40.47%	25.61%	15.72%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and SOBO.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.23

Return for Risk

XLU vs. SOBO.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 26
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 24
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 24

SOBO.TO

SOBO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SOBO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SOBO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SOBO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SOBO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLU	SOBO.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	2.52	-1.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.18	3.42	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.41	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	4.00	-2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.80	11.44	-8.64

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the SOBO.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and SOBO.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than SOBO.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and SOBO.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	SOBO.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-27.09%	-24.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-12.68%	+3.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.05%	-0.27%	-5.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-4.27%	-5.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.25%	4.44%	-0.19%

Volatility

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) is 5.59%, while South Bow Corp (SOBO.TO) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that XLU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOBO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	SOBO.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	7.11%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.68%	14.83%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.66%	20.22%	-5.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	44.59%	-27.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.27%	44.59%	-25.32%

Dividends

XLU vs. SOBO.TO - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than SOBO.TO's 5.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SOBO.TO South Bow Corp	5.18%	7.37%	2.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.67%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLU and SOBO.TO in my portfolio?

XLU and SOBO.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.