XLU vs. FPWR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FPWR (First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. XLU is passively managed, while FPWR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLU returned 10.60%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for FPWR. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FPWR.

Performance

XLU vs. FPWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than FPWR's 14.10% return.

XLU

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 0.02%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 7.17%
• 1Y: 14.05%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 10.60%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

FPWR

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 20.93%
• 3Y*: 18.24%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. FPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	6.99%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	6.25%
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF	14.10%	16.78%	22.60%	-3.36%	5.28%	12.26%	8.98%	5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and FPWR is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2019	0.87

The correlation between XLU and FPWR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLU vs. FPWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLU	FPWR
Utilities	100.0%	51.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	30.0%
Financial Services	-	1.7%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	6.7%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

XLU vs. FPWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 27
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 26

FPWR

FPWR Risk / Return Rank: 70
FPWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
FPWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FPWR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FPWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FPWR Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. FPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLU	FPWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	2.00	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	2.89	-1.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.54	4.19	-2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.26	10.54	-7.28

XLU vs. FPWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FPWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and FPWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLU vs. FPWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than FPWR's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and FPWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	FPWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-32.28%	-19.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-5.02%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	-14.68%	-2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-19.88%	-5.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-1.98%	-2.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.21%	-4.98%	-5.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	1.99%	+2.33%

Volatility

XLU vs. FPWR - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF (FPWR) at 3.60%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	FPWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	3.60%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.70%	8.20%	+3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.69%	10.57%	+4.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	14.21%	+3.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.29%	17.36%	+1.93%

XLU vs. FPWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FPWR's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLU vs. FPWR - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than FPWR's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPWR First Trust EIP Power Solutions ETF	1.80%	1.97%	2.52%	2.54%	1.72%	1.66%	1.68%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.65%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLU and FPWR in my portfolio?

XLU and FPWR have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLU or FPWR?

XLU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FPWR (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs FPWR's -32.28%.

Which ETF is better, XLU or FPWR?

On 5-year performance, FPWR leads with 12.46% vs 10.60% for XLU. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FPWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLU or FPWR?

Over the 5-year period, FPWR has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLU or FPWR?

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for FPWR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLU or FPWR?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.80% for FPWR.

What is the main difference between XLU and FPWR?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.96% for FPWR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.