XLU vs. BSCQ
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLU returned 10.60%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for BSCQ. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
XLU vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than BSCQ's 1.68% return.
XLU
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 14.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
XLU vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.99% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.68% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 9.41% | 13.94% | -2.40% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and BSCQ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2016 | 0.23 |
The correlation between XLU and BSCQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
BSCQ
XLU vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 3.40 | -2.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 41.36 | -39.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.26 | 181.24 | -177.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -16.50% | -35.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -0.10% | -9.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -1.13% | -16.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -13.02% | -12.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.30% | -0.03% | -4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -2.83% | -7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 0.02% | +4.30% |
Volatility
XLU vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.12%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 0.12% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 0.42% | +11.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 0.61% | +14.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 3.29% | +14.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 4.75% | +14.54% |
XLU vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLU vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to BSCQ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 5-year performance, XLU leads with 10.60% vs 1.51% for BSCQ. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLU has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 1.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 2.65% for XLU.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while BSCQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.97 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer