XLRE vs. DBMF
XLRE (Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLRE is a REIT fund tracking the Real Estate Select Sector Index, while DBMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. XLRE is passively managed, while DBMF is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLRE returned 3.42%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLRE charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
XLRE vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLRE achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 9.70% return.
XLRE
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 6.96%
DBMF
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- —
XLRE vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 11.53% | 2.63% | 5.09% | 12.36% | -26.25% | 46.10% | -2.18% | 11.48% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 9.70% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLRE and DBMF is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.02 |
The correlation between XLRE and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (5 years) to 0.07 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLRE vs. DBMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLRE
DBMF
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
XLRE
DBMF
Basic Materials
XLRE
DBMF
Communication Services
XLRE
-
DBMF
Consumer Cyclical
XLRE
-
DBMF
Consumer Defensive
XLRE
-
DBMF
Energy
XLRE
-
DBMF
Financial Services
XLRE
-
DBMF
Healthcare
XLRE
-
DBMF
Industrials
XLRE
-
DBMF
Technology
XLRE
-
DBMF
Utilities
XLRE
-
DBMF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLRE vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
XLRE
DBMF
XLRE vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLRE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.48 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 4.58 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 16.82 | -13.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLRE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 2.26 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.63 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.74 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
XLRE vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLRE drawdown since its inception was -38.83%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLRE and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLRE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.83% | -20.39% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -6.10% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.74% | -15.60% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.12% | -20.39% | -13.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -2.42% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -6.58% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 1.66% | +1.37% |
Volatility
XLRE vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLRE) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.88%. This indicates that XLRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLRE | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 2.88% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 10.00% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.59% | 12.35% | +1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 12.55% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 12.43% | +7.97% |
XLRE vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLRE has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLRE vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
XLRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than DBMF's 5.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.22% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLRE Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.43% | 3.31% | 3.70% | 2.61% | 3.15% | 3.06% | 3.78% | 3.25% | 4.22% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLRE and DBMF have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLRE has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to DBMF (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLRE dropped -38.83% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
On 5-year performance, DBMF leads with 7.93% vs 3.42% for XLRE. On fees, XLRE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, DBMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBMF has performed better with a 7.93% return vs 3.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLRE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 3.13% for XLRE.
XLRE is categorized as REIT, while DBMF is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iM Global Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLRE and 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLRE and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer