PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLP vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 32.66% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 7.58%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.24% annualized return.


XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%

SPMO

1D
3.52%
1M
10.01%
YTD
32.66%
6M
33.70%
1Y
50.00%
3Y*
43.16%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
21.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
32.66%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and SPMO is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.36

The correlation between XLP and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLP vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLP
SPMO

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
1.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.5%

Communication Services

-

8.2%

Energy

-

3.1%

Financial Services

-

5.9%

Healthcare

-

6.4%

Industrials

-

11.1%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

54.9%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

XLP
99.0%
SPMO
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XLP
1.0%
SPMO
1.2%

Basic Materials

XLP

-

SPMO
1.5%

Communication Services

XLP

-

SPMO
8.2%

Energy

XLP

-

SPMO
3.1%

Financial Services

XLP

-

SPMO
5.9%

Healthcare

XLP

-

SPMO
6.4%

Industrials

XLP

-

SPMO
11.1%

Real Estate

XLP

-

SPMO
1.0%

Technology

XLP

-

SPMO
54.9%

Utilities

XLP

-

SPMO
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLP vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLPSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.46

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

3.96

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

14.96

-13.26

XLP vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLP vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLPSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-30.95%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-12.70%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-20.13%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-22.74%

+6.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

-30.95%

+6.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

0.00%

-4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-4.60%

-2.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

3.35%

+1.67%

Volatility

XLP vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.55%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.78%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLPSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

10.78%

-6.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

17.04%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

19.78%

-6.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

19.71%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

20.52%

-5.77%

XLP vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLP vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than SPMO's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.64%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLP and SPMO have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.24% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.24% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for SPMO.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.64% for SPMO.

XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLP and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer