PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. SPLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLP vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed SPLV with an annualized return of 7.60%, while SPLV has yielded a comparatively higher 8.36% annualized return.


XLP

1D
0.65%
1M
1.30%
YTD
11.10%
6M
9.54%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
6.65%
10Y*
7.60%

SPLV

1D
0.85%
1M
2.60%
YTD
5.23%
6M
5.17%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
11.10%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
5.23%4.10%13.93%0.53%-4.88%24.13%-1.39%27.87%-0.19%17.32%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and SPLV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011

0.83

The correlation between XLP and SPLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLP vs. SPLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLP
SPLV

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
5.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

0.9%

Energy

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

16.6%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

14.8%

Technology

-

4.6%

Utilities

-

26.8%

Consumer Defensive

XLP
99.0%
SPLV
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLP
1.0%
SPLV
5.7%

Basic Materials

XLP

-

SPLV
2.0%

Communication Services

XLP

-

SPLV
0.9%

Energy

XLP

-

SPLV
0.9%

Financial Services

XLP

-

SPLV
16.6%

Healthcare

XLP

-

SPLV
6.8%

Industrials

XLP

-

SPLV
10.1%

Real Estate

XLP

-

SPLV
14.8%

Technology

XLP

-

SPLV
4.6%

Utilities

XLP

-

SPLV
26.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLP vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPLV
SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLPSPLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.07

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

0.56

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

1.31

+0.21

XLP vs. SPLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the SPLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and SPLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLP vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, roughly equal to the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and SPLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLPSPLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-36.26%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-7.41%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-9.64%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-17.26%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

-36.26%

+11.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.12%

-3.31%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-3.55%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.01%

3.15%

+1.86%

Volatility

XLP vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) at 4.01%. This indicates that XLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLPSPLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

4.01%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

7.23%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

10.14%

+2.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

12.50%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

15.38%

-0.63%

XLP vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLP vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than SPLV's 2.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
2.14%2.04%1.88%2.45%2.11%1.51%2.12%2.08%2.18%2.03%2.03%2.28%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.53%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLP and SPLV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to SPLV (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs SPLV's -36.26%.

On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.36% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.36% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.14% for SPLV.

XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SPLV is S&P 500. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.25% for SPLV.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLP and SPLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer