XLP vs. LTPZ
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and LTPZ (PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while LTPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LTPZ. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for LTPZ.
Performance
XLP vs. LTPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than LTPZ's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has outperformed LTPZ with an annualized return of 7.60%, while LTPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.75% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
LTPZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.67%
- 5Y*
- -5.50%
- 10Y*
- 0.75%
XLP vs. LTPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 0.53% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | 17.47% | -7.22% | 9.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and LTPZ is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2009 | -0.02 |
The correlation between XLP and LTPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. LTPZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
LTPZ
XLP vs. LTPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.07 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.52 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 1.11 | +0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. LTPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum LTPZ drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and LTPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -40.99% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -7.00% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -16.27% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -40.99% | +24.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -40.99% | +16.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -32.66% | +28.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -12.44% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 3.28% | +1.73% |
Volatility
XLP vs. LTPZ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) at 2.55%. This indicates that XLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | LTPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 2.55% | +1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 6.54% | +3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 9.19% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 15.87% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 15.07% | -0.32% |
XLP vs. LTPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than LTPZ's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLP vs. LTPZ - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than LTPZ's 5.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 5.22% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and LTPZ have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to LTPZ (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs LTPZ's -40.99%.
On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.60% vs 0.75% for LTPZ. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, LTPZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 0.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LTPZ.
LTPZ has the higher dividend yield at 5.22%, compared with 2.53% for XLP.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while LTPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while LTPZ tracks ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). They also come from different issuers: State Street and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.20% for LTPZ.
XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and LTPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer