XLP vs. DIV
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 4.30%/yr for DIV. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
XLP vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly lower than DIV's 14.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 7.60%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 13.33%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.30%
XLP vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 14.48% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and DIV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.60 |
The correlation between XLP and DIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLP vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
DIV
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
DIV
Basic Materials
XLP
-
DIV
Communication Services
XLP
-
DIV
Energy
XLP
-
DIV
Financial Services
XLP
-
DIV
Healthcare
XLP
-
DIV
Industrials
XLP
-
DIV
Real Estate
XLP
-
DIV
Technology
XLP
-
DIV
-
Utilities
XLP
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
DIV
XLP vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.26 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 3.02 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 8.43 | -6.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -52.74% | +16.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -5.23% | -4.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -12.33% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -21.14% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -52.74% | +28.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -0.73% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -7.01% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 1.88% | +3.13% |
Volatility
XLP vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.07%. This indicates that XLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 3.07% | +1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 7.08% | +3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 10.32% | +2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 13.69% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 17.98% | -3.23% |
XLP vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLP vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than DIV's 6.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.61% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and DIV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to DIV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, XLP leads with 7.60% vs 4.30% for DIV. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLP has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 2.53% for XLP.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.45% for DIV.
DIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer