XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE
XLME.DE (21Shares Stellar ETP) and CTEN.DE (CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLME.DE returned 25.76%/yr vs 17.30%/yr for CTEN.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLME.DE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for CTEN.DE.
Performance
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLME.DE achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly higher than CTEN.DE's -30.10% return.
XLME.DE
- 1D
- -6.58%
- 1M
- 30.88%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -15.33%
- 1Y
- -24.44%
- 3Y*
- 25.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTEN.DE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -16.86%
- YTD
- -30.10%
- 6M
- -33.20%
- 1Y
- -35.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XLME.DE 21Shares Stellar ETP | -2.01% | -45.22% | 165.66% | 38.50% |
CTEN.DE CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP | -30.10% | -19.43% | 96.51% | 53.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLME.DE and CTEN.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2023 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XLME.DE and CTEN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XLME.DE
CTEN.DE
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) and CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLME.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.89 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.66 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | -1.10 | +0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLME.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | -0.76 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.35 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLME.DE drawdown since its inception was -82.74%, which is greater than CTEN.DE's maximum drawdown of -56.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLME.DE and CTEN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLME.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.74% | -56.27% | -26.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.51% | -56.27% | -14.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.28% | -56.27% | -22.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.57% | -55.40% | -13.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.68% | -19.06% | -43.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.90% | 33.71% | +14.19% |
Volatility
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) has a higher volatility of 32.82% compared to CoinShares Physical Top10 Crypto Market ETP (CTEN.DE) at 9.77%. This indicates that XLME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLME.DE | CTEN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.82% | 9.77% | +23.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.83% | 35.00% | +16.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.47% | 49.20% | +29.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.68% | 52.10% | +36.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.68% | 52.10% | +36.58% |
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLME.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CTEN.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLME.DE vs. CTEN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLME.DE nor CTEN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLME.DE and CTEN.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTEN.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for XLME.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for XLME.DE and 0.00% for CTEN.DE.
Find the right allocation for XLME.DE and CTEN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer