PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) and CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR (COMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XLME.DE
21Shares Stellar ETP
-18.88%-45.22%165.66%71.95%-40.22%
COMS.DE
CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR
-11.28%-71.45%-37.78%24.55%32.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLME.DE achieves a -18.88% return, which is significantly lower than COMS.DE's -11.28% return.


XLME.DE

1D
3.80%
1M
8.22%
YTD
-18.88%
6M
-55.90%
1Y
-43.29%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
10Y*

COMS.DE

1D
-0.78%
1M
-7.60%
YTD
-11.28%
6M
-58.43%
1Y
-63.32%
3Y*
-45.55%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLME.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than COMS.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLME.DE
XLME.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XLME.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLME.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLME.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
XLME.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLME.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

COMS.DE
COMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
COMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) and CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR (COMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLME.DECOMS.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.57

-0.93

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.64

-1.54

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.83

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

-0.90

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.06

-1.47

+0.41

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLME.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is higher than the COMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLME.DE and COMS.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLME.DECOMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

-0.93

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

-0.40

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between XLME.DE and COMS.DE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLME.DE nor COMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLME.DE drawdown since its inception was -82.74%, smaller than the maximum COMS.DE drawdown of -89.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLME.DE and COMS.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLME.DECOMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.74%

-89.49%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.69%

-68.36%

-1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.99%

-89.39%

+15.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.23%

-52.79%

-9.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.31%

41.81%

-1.50%

Volatility

XLME.DE vs. COMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

21Shares Stellar ETP (XLME.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.59% compared to CoinShares Physical Staked Cosmos EUR (COMS.DE) at 11.51%. This indicates that XLME.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLME.DECOMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.59%

11.51%

+6.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.94%

51.50%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.22%

67.35%

+7.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.60%

74.89%

+13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.60%

74.89%

+13.71%