XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE
XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) and LYYB.DE (Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while LYYB.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L returned 24.64%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for LYYB.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLKQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for LYYB.DE.
Performance
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLKQ.L is traded in GBp, while LYYB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LYYB.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLKQ.L achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly higher than LYYB.DE's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XLKQ.L has outperformed LYYB.DE with an annualized return of 24.64%, while LYYB.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 13.83% annualized return.
XLKQ.L
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- 6M
- 19.21%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.96%
- 5Y*
- 22.20%
- 10Y*
- 24.64%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.82%
LYYB.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.72%
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 16.15% | 15.76% | 44.03% | 51.84% | -20.58% | 36.28% | 37.93% | 44.38% | 2.54% | 21.82% |
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 8.52% | 8.18% | 25.55% | 19.77% | -12.47% | 29.00% | 15.73% | 27.68% | 0.17% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLKQ.L and LYYB.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2009 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XLKQ.L and LYYB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XLKQ.L
LYYB.DE
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) and Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLKQ.L | LYYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.14 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 7.07 | -2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLKQ.L drawdown since its inception was -38.43%, which is greater than LYYB.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKQ.L and LYYB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLKQ.L | LYYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.43% | -34.46% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.76% | -8.74% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -23.18% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.74% | -23.18% | -5.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.74% | -26.76% | -1.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.84% | -1.56% | -7.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -5.01% | -3.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.94% | 2.65% | +4.29% |
Volatility
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist (LYYB.DE) at 3.07%. This indicates that XLKQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLKQ.L | LYYB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 3.07% | +4.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.30% | 8.01% | +8.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.11% | 11.74% | +9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.43% | 15.20% | +11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.46% | 16.05% | +7.41% |
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLKQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than LYYB.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLKQ.L vs. LYYB.DE - Dividend Comparison
XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYYB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYYB.DE Amundi MSCI USA ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Dist | 0.81% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 1.12% | 0.95% | 1.31% | 1.14% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.87% | 2.03% |
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLKQ.L and LYYB.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYYB.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYYB.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.
XLKQ.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while LYYB.DE is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index, while LYYB.DE tracks MSCI USA ESG Broad Select. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLKQ.L and 0.09% for LYYB.DE.
Find the right allocation for XLKQ.L and LYYB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer