PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.25% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 25.48%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.01% annualized return.


XLK

1D
-4.14%
1M
2.23%
YTD
28.25%
6M
26.51%
1Y
52.47%
3Y*
30.61%
5Y*
21.34%
10Y*
25.48%

XLV

1D
1.41%
1M
1.98%
YTD
-0.85%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
6.63%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
10.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.25%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-0.85%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and XLV is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and XLV has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLK vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
XLV

Technology

99.7%

-

Energy

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

100.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLK
99.7%
XLV

-

Energy

XLK
0.2%
XLV

-

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

XLK

-

XLV

-

Communication Services

XLK

-

XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

XLV

-

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

XLV

-

Financial Services

XLK

-

XLV

-

Healthcare

XLK

-

XLV
100.0%

Real Estate

XLK

-

XLV

-

Utilities

XLK

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.20

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.65

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.56

3.89

+6.67

XLK vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-39.17%

-42.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-10.47%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-17.11%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-17.11%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-28.40%

-5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-4.20%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.90%

-7.12%

-27.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.98%

4.42%

+0.56%

Volatility

XLK vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 12.51% compared to State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) at 5.27%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.51%

5.27%

+7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.70%

10.68%

+9.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.48%

15.09%

+8.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.37%

14.77%

+10.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.71%

16.57%

+8.14%

XLK vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLK and XLV have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than XLV's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.43%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.66%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and XLV have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (12.51%) compared to XLV (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs XLV's -39.17%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.48% vs 10.01% for XLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLV has been the lower-risk option at 5.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.48% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK and XLV have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.43% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer