PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. VNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 25.19%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.


XLK

1D
0.87%
1M
2.95%
YTD
28.52%
6M
28.96%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
25.19%

VNQ

1D
0.92%
1M
3.35%
YTD
12.51%
6M
12.32%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
10.14%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.52%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
12.51%3.24%4.81%11.85%-26.25%40.54%-4.61%28.91%-6.03%4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and VNQ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2004

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and VNQ has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VNQ
VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKVNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.17

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.56

+1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

4.90

+5.95

XLK vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than VNQ's maximum drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and VNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKVNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-73.07%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-8.34%

-7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-17.46%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-34.48%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-42.40%

+8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

0.00%

-6.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-13.61%

-21.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

2.65%

+2.27%

Volatility

XLK vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 4.72%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKVNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.86%

4.72%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

9.77%

+9.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

13.54%

+9.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

18.84%

+6.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

20.72%

+3.92%

XLK vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than VNQ's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VNQ
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
3.54%3.92%3.85%3.95%3.91%2.56%3.93%3.39%4.74%4.23%4.82%3.92%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and VNQ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to VNQ (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 5.65% for VNQ. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VNQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VNQ.

VNQ has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while VNQ is REIT. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while VNQ tracks MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.13% for VNQ.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and VNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer