XLK vs. TRUT
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLK is passively managed, while TRUT is actively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for TRUT.
Performance
XLK vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 36.47% return, which is significantly higher than TRUT's 25.30% return.
XLK
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 21.09%
- YTD
- 36.47%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- 66.93%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 25.84%
TRUT
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 16.68%
- YTD
- 25.30%
- 6M
- 24.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 36.47% | 11.52% |
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 25.30% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and TRUT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. TRUT — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
TRUT
XLK vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.24 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.16 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 2.39 | -1.97 |
Drawdowns
XLK vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than TRUT's maximum drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and TRUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -18.55% | -63.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -1.46% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -5.17% | -29.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | — | — |
Volatility
XLK vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | TRUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.82% | 21.53% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 21.53% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 21.53% | +2.96% |
XLK vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLK vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than TRUT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF | 0.19% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.39% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XLK and TRUT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for TRUT.
XLK has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.19% for TRUT.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.13% for TRUT.
Find the right allocation for XLK and TRUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer