PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 47.28% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 25.19%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.55% annualized return.


XLK

1D
0.87%
1M
4.50%
YTD
28.52%
6M
28.96%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
25.19%

TQQQ

1D
1.99%
1M
0.36%
YTD
47.28%
6M
47.23%
1Y
106.26%
3Y*
59.79%
5Y*
24.34%
10Y*
44.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.52%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
47.28%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and TQQQ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010

0.96

The correlation between XLK and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLK vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
TQQQ

Technology

99.7%
53.8%

Energy

0.2%
0.6%

Industrials

0.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

XLK
99.7%
TQQQ
53.8%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
TQQQ
0.6%

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
TQQQ
2.8%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

XLK

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Financial Services

XLK

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Healthcare

XLK

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Real Estate

XLK

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Utilities

XLK

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.89

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

9.26

+1.59

XLK vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-81.66%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-36.97%

+21.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-58.04%

+32.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-81.66%

+48.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-81.66%

+48.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-11.12%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-18.51%

-16.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

11.52%

-6.60%

Volatility

XLK vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 10.86%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 22.79%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.86%

22.79%

-11.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

41.26%

-22.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

51.24%

-28.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

67.02%

-41.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

66.22%

-41.58%

XLK vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLK vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, which matches TQQQ's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.41%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XLK and TQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TQQQ has higher volatility (22.79%) compared to XLK (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.55% vs 25.19% for XLK. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 10.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.55% return vs 25.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

XLK and TQQQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.41%.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.95% for TQQQ.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer