XLK vs. TIME

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and TIME (Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLK is passively managed, while TIME is actively managed. Over the past year, XLK returned 43.26% vs 17.05% for TIME. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for TIME.

Performance

XLK vs. TIME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 30.13% return, which is significantly higher than TIME's 9.18% return.

XLK

• 1D: 4.98%
• 1M: 3.49%
• 6M: 31.87%
• YTD: 30.13%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 20.15%
• 10Y*: 24.33%
• ALL TIME*: 10.46%

TIME

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 2.44%
• 6M: 8.57%
• YTD: 9.18%
• 1Y: 17.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	$49.28K	$42.67K	$99.16K
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	$1.76B	$1.67B	$2.24B

XLK vs. TIME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	30.13%	24.61%	2.33%
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	9.18%	10.17%	5.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and TIME is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2024	0.79

The correlation between XLK and TIME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLK vs. TIME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLK	TIME
Technology	99.1%	45.5%
Communication Services	0.9%	15.6%
Energy	0.2%	6.8%
Industrials	0.1%	5.3%
Basic Materials	-	3.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.5%
Financial Services	-	3.6%
Healthcare	-	6.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

XLK vs. TIME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 61
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 56

TIME

TIME Risk / Return Rank: 39
TIME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TIME Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
TIME Omega Ratio Rank: 40
TIME Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
TIME Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLK vs. TIME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLK	TIME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.21	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.67	+0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.73	1.31	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.35	4.46	+2.89

XLK vs. TIME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the TIME Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and TIME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLK vs. TIME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than TIME's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and TIME.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLK	TIME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.05%	-24.26%	-57.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-13.09%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.59%	-1.31%	-4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.79%	-5.43%	-29.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.90%	3.83%	+2.07%

Volatility

XLK vs. TIME - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.47% compared to Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF (TIME) at 4.14%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLK	TIME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.47%	4.14%	+6.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.23%	11.23%	+11.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.96%	14.26%	+11.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.86%	17.55%	+8.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.96%	17.55%	+7.41%

XLK vs. TIME - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TIME's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLK vs. TIME - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than TIME's 9.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TIME Clockwise U.S. Core Equity ETF	9.18%	10.02%	15.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.42%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLK and TIME in my portfolio?

XLK and TIME have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLK or TIME?

XLK has higher volatility (10.47%) compared to TIME (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs TIME's -24.26%.

Which ETF is better, XLK or TIME?

On 1-year performance, XLK leads with 43.26% vs 17.05% for TIME. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TIME has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLK or TIME?

Over the 1-year period, XLK has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 17.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLK or TIME?

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for TIME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLK or TIME?

TIME has the higher dividend yield at 9.18%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.

What is the main difference between XLK and TIME?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Clockwise. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 1.00% for TIME.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.