PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV's 21.17% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 25.19%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively lower 18.57% annualized return.


XLK

1D
0.87%
1M
2.95%
YTD
28.52%
6M
28.96%
1Y
55.42%
3Y*
30.28%
5Y*
22.02%
10Y*
25.19%

TDIV

1D
0.97%
1M
3.59%
YTD
21.17%
6M
20.34%
1Y
37.96%
3Y*
28.42%
5Y*
17.37%
10Y*
18.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.52%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
21.17%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and TDIV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012

0.90

The correlation between XLK and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLK vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
TDIV

Technology

99.7%
87.1%

Energy

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%
1.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLK
99.7%
TDIV
87.1%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
TDIV

-

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
TDIV
1.3%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Communication Services

XLK

-

TDIV
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Financial Services

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Healthcare

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Real Estate

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Utilities

XLK

-

TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.23

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

9.78

+1.07

XLK vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-31.97%

-50.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-11.35%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-23.00%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-31.97%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-31.97%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-8.87%

+2.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.93%

-4.85%

-30.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.92%

3.74%

+1.18%

Volatility

XLK vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) at 9.90%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.86%

9.90%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

15.62%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

19.72%

+2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.18%

20.90%

+4.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.64%

20.96%

+3.68%

XLK vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLK vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than TDIV's 1.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.20%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.41%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and TDIV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to TDIV (9.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 18.57% for TDIV. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, TDIV has been the lower-risk option at 9.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 18.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.

XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.50% for TDIV.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer