XLK vs. IYH
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for IYH. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.
Performance
XLK vs. IYH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 25.19%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.52% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
XLK vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and IYH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and IYH has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLK vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
IYH
Technology
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLK
IYH
-
Energy
XLK
IYH
-
Industrials
XLK
IYH
-
Basic Materials
XLK
-
IYH
-
Communication Services
XLK
-
IYH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
IYH
-
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
IYH
-
Financial Services
XLK
-
IYH
-
Healthcare
XLK
-
IYH
Real Estate
XLK
-
IYH
-
Utilities
XLK
-
IYH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
IYH
XLK vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.33 | +2.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 3.18 | +7.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and IYH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -43.12% | -38.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -10.64% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -17.91% | -7.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -17.91% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -28.40% | -5.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -3.94% | -2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -8.96% | -25.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 4.46% | +0.46% |
Volatility
XLK vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.94%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | IYH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 4.94% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 10.64% | +8.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 15.10% | +7.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 14.96% | +10.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 16.74% | +7.90% |
XLK vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than IYH's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and IYH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to IYH (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs IYH's -43.12%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 9.52% for IYH. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.43% for IYH.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and IYH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer