PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. FRDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. FRDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly lower than FRDM's 26.86% return.


XLK

1D
0.07%
1M
-8.11%
6M
20.96%
YTD
22.34%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
19.16%
10Y*
23.89%
ALL TIME*
10.23%

FRDM

1D
-0.48%
1M
-14.88%
6M
16.73%
YTD
26.86%
1Y
62.81%
3Y*
29.03%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. FRDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.34%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%24.12%
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
26.86%61.27%1.70%22.77%-14.45%6.13%16.90%12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and FRDM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2019

0.65

The correlation between XLK and FRDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLK vs. FRDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
FRDM

Technology

99.1%
8.2%

Communication Services

0.9%
0.6%

Energy

0.2%
1.7%

Industrials

0.1%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

15.3%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

XLK
99.1%
FRDM
8.2%

Communication Services

XLK
0.9%
FRDM
0.6%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
FRDM
1.7%

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
FRDM
0.3%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

FRDM
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

FRDM
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

FRDM
0.9%

Financial Services

XLK

-

FRDM
15.3%

Healthcare

XLK

-

FRDM
0.1%

Real Estate

XLK

-

FRDM
2.3%

Utilities

XLK

-

FRDM
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. FRDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDM
FRDM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. FRDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKFRDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.74

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

12.45

-5.92

XLK vs. FRDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the FRDM Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and FRDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. FRDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than FRDM's maximum drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and FRDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKFRDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-40.49%

-41.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-16.87%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-16.87%

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-29.25%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-14.99%

+3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-7.09%

-27.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

5.06%

+0.37%

Volatility

XLK vs. FRDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 9.59%, while Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a volatility of 12.98%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKFRDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

12.98%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

27.60%

-6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.61%

29.70%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

22.10%

+3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

23.48%

+1.33%

XLK vs. FRDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLK vs. FRDM - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than FRDM's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDM
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
1.71%2.26%2.53%2.66%2.72%2.17%1.11%1.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.45%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and FRDM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDM has higher volatility (12.98%) compared to XLK (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs FRDM's -40.49%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 19.16% vs 16.96% for FRDM. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 9.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 19.16% return vs 16.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRDM.

FRDM has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while FRDM is Emerging Markets Diversified. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while FRDM tracks Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Freedom Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.49% for FRDM.

FRDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and FRDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer