XLK vs. ETV
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while ETV (Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 9.44%/yr for ETV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
XLK vs. ETV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than ETV's 6.52% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed ETV with an annualized return of 25.19%, while ETV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.44% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
ETV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- 1Y
- 18.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
XLK vs. ETV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 6.52% | 8.63% | 27.67% | 9.94% | -19.73% | 18.41% | 13.03% | 21.25% | -4.29% | 12.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and ETV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2005 | 0.62 |
The correlation between XLK and ETV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. ETV — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
ETV
XLK vs. ETV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | ETV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.27 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.78 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 9.05 | +1.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. ETV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than ETV's maximum drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and ETV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | ETV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -52.11% | -29.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -10.34% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -20.27% | -5.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -22.71% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -42.39% | +8.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -1.14% | -5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -5.57% | -29.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 2.03% | +2.89% |
Volatility
XLK vs. ETV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) at 3.67%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | ETV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 3.67% | +7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 10.11% | +8.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 12.31% | +10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 16.88% | +8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 19.29% | +5.35% |
Dividends
XLK vs. ETV - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than ETV's 8.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETV Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund | 8.06% | 8.30% | 8.18% | 9.24% | 10.57% | 7.94% | 8.66% | 8.89% | 9.86% | 8.65% | 8.96% | 8.69% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and ETV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to ETV (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs ETV's -52.11%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and ETV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer