PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLIP.L vs. FXR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while FXR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly higher than FXR's 15.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLIP.L having a 14.44% annualized return and FXR not far behind at 14.23%.


XLIP.L

1D
1.02%
1M
8.07%
YTD
20.61%
6M
20.58%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
21.01%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
14.44%

FXR

1D
1.49%
1M
6.06%
YTD
15.60%
6M
13.72%
1Y
29.05%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLIP.L
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
20.61%11.11%19.28%11.56%6.12%22.08%6.17%24.82%-9.69%9.91%
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
15.60%-0.10%18.22%20.64%-6.78%26.26%9.50%28.35%-10.08%13.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XLIP.L and FXR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.61

The correlation between XLIP.L and FXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLIP.L
FXR

Industrials

96.3%
70.5%

Technology

1.3%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.3%
7.5%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

6.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

3.4%

Healthcare

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Industrials

XLIP.L
96.3%
FXR
70.5%

Technology

XLIP.L
1.3%
FXR
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLIP.L
1.3%
FXR
7.5%

Real Estate

XLIP.L
1.1%
FXR

-

Basic Materials

XLIP.L

-

FXR
6.2%

Communication Services

XLIP.L

-

FXR

-

Consumer Defensive

XLIP.L

-

FXR

-

Energy

XLIP.L

-

FXR

-

Financial Services

XLIP.L

-

FXR
3.4%

Healthcare

XLIP.L

-

FXR
0.7%

Utilities

XLIP.L

-

FXR
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLIP.L vs. FXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLIP.L
XLIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FXR
FXR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLIP.LFXRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.27

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.38

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

7.23

+4.02

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the FXR Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLIP.L and FXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, smaller than the maximum FXR drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and FXR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIP.LFXRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-47.19%

+12.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-12.27%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.02%

-28.41%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.02%

-28.41%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.56%

-37.59%

+3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-7.74%

+3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

4.03%

-1.08%

Volatility

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) is 4.81%, while First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that XLIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIP.LFXRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

5.98%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.91%

14.59%

-3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.74%

18.59%

-4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

19.48%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

21.42%

-3.11%

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FXR's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLIP.L vs. FXR - Dividend Comparison

XLIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXR
First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.71%0.72%0.77%0.92%0.52%1.06%0.74%1.18%0.55%0.52%0.62%
XLIP.L
Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLIP.L and FXR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.

XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.64% for FXR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and FXR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer