XLIP.L vs. FXR
XLIP.L (Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF) and FXR (First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund) are both Industrials Equities funds - XLIP.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while FXR tracks the StrataQuant Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLIP.L returned 14.44%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for FXR. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLIP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FXR.
Performance
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLIP.L is traded in GBp, while FXR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLIP.L achieves a 20.61% return, which is significantly higher than FXR's 15.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLIP.L having a 14.44% annualized return and FXR not far behind at 14.23%.
XLIP.L
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 20.61%
- 6M
- 20.58%
- 1Y
- 33.33%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
FXR
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 29.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 20.61% | 11.11% | 19.28% | 11.56% | 6.12% | 22.08% | 6.17% | 24.82% | -9.69% | 9.91% |
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 15.60% | -0.10% | 18.22% | 20.64% | -6.78% | 26.26% | 9.50% | 28.35% | -10.08% | 13.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLIP.L and FXR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XLIP.L and FXR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLIP.L
FXR
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
XLIP.L
FXR
Technology
XLIP.L
FXR
Consumer Cyclical
XLIP.L
FXR
Real Estate
XLIP.L
FXR
-
Basic Materials
XLIP.L
-
FXR
Communication Services
XLIP.L
-
FXR
-
Consumer Defensive
XLIP.L
-
FXR
-
Energy
XLIP.L
-
FXR
-
Financial Services
XLIP.L
-
FXR
Healthcare
XLIP.L
-
FXR
Utilities
XLIP.L
-
FXR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLIP.L vs. FXR — Risk / Return Rank
XLIP.L
FXR
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) and First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLIP.L | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.38 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 7.23 | +4.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLIP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, smaller than the maximum FXR drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLIP.L and FXR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLIP.L | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.56% | -47.19% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -12.27% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.02% | -28.41% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.02% | -28.41% | +7.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.56% | -37.59% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.42% | -7.74% | +3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 4.03% | -1.08% |
Volatility
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF (XLIP.L) is 4.81%, while First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund (FXR) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that XLIP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLIP.L | FXR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 5.98% | -1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 14.59% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.74% | 18.59% | -4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 19.48% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.31% | 21.42% | -3.11% |
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLIP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than FXR's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLIP.L vs. FXR - Dividend Comparison
XLIP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXR First Trust Industrials/Producer Durables AlphaDEX Fund | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 0.55% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
XLIP.L Invesco US Industrials Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLIP.L and FXR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLIP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for FXR.
XLIP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while FXR tracks StrataQuant Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLIP.L and 0.64% for FXR.
Find the right allocation for XLIP.L and FXR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer