XLI vs. VT
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 14.15%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
XLI vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 14.15%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 12.93% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 25.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
XLI vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and VT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XLI and VT shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLI vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
VT
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
XLI
VT
Utilities
XLI
VT
Technology
XLI
VT
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
VT
Basic Materials
XLI
-
VT
Communication Services
XLI
-
VT
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
VT
Energy
XLI
-
VT
Financial Services
XLI
-
VT
Healthcare
XLI
-
VT
Real Estate
XLI
-
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
VT
XLI vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.68 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 11.67 | -3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLI vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -50.27% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -9.67% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -16.51% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -26.38% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -34.24% | -8.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -1.92% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -7.01% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.22% | +0.87% |
Volatility
XLI vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 5.26%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 5.26% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 11.01% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 13.38% | +2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 16.15% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 17.27% | +2.77% |
XLI vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLI vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and VT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 14.15% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLI.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.16% for XLI.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while VT is Global Equities. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer