XLI vs. SMH
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 14.15%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
XLI vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 14.15%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
SMH
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 72.15%
- 6M
- 75.62%
- 1Y
- 136.32%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 38.42%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
XLI vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 72.15% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and SMH is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.61 |
The correlation between XLI and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLI vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
SMH
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
XLI
SMH
-
Utilities
XLI
SMH
-
Technology
XLI
SMH
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
SMH
-
Basic Materials
XLI
-
SMH
-
Communication Services
XLI
-
SMH
-
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
SMH
-
Energy
XLI
-
SMH
-
Financial Services
XLI
-
SMH
-
Healthcare
XLI
-
SMH
-
Real Estate
XLI
-
SMH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
SMH
XLI vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.60 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 9.18 | -7.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 33.74 | -25.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLI vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -84.96% | +22.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -14.93% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -35.74% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -45.30% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -45.30% | +2.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -2.81% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -41.04% | +31.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 4.06% | -0.97% |
Volatility
XLI vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) is 6.22%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that XLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 16.25% | -10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 27.73% | -14.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 33.20% | -17.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 35.47% | -17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 32.82% | -12.78% |
XLI vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLI vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and SMH have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to XLI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs SMH's -84.96%.
On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 14.15% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.
XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.35% for SMH.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer