PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLI vs. SIVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLI vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's -4.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLI having a 14.15% annualized return and SIVR not far ahead at 14.22%.


XLI

1D
0.59%
1M
2.79%
YTD
13.90%
6M
13.10%
1Y
25.17%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
14.15%

SIVR

1D
0.78%
1M
-11.18%
YTD
-4.75%
6M
9.46%
1Y
86.32%
3Y*
41.59%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLI vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
13.90%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
-4.75%145.34%21.08%-0.91%2.59%-12.33%47.52%15.17%-8.96%5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between XLI and SIVR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2009

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLI vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SIVR
SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLI vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLISIVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.90

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

4.12

+3.69

XLI vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLI Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLI and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLI vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and SIVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLISIVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

-75.85%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-45.33%

+33.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-45.33%

+26.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-45.33%

+23.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-45.33%

+3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.24%

-41.89%

+40.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-47.83%

+38.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

20.85%

-17.76%

Volatility

XLI vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) is 6.22%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.37%. This indicates that XLI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLISIVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

16.37%

-10.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.59%

59.11%

-45.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

59.76%

-43.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

36.48%

-18.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.04%

32.03%

-11.99%

XLI vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLI vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIVR
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.16%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLI and SIVR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIVR has higher volatility (16.37%) compared to XLI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs SIVR's -75.85%.

On 10-year performance, SIVR leads with 14.22% vs 14.15% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SIVR has performed better with a 14.22% return vs 14.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

XLI has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for SIVR.

XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SIVR is Silver. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: State Street and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.30% for SIVR.

XLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLI and SIVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer