XLI vs. IFRA
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and IFRA (iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - XLI tracks the Industrial Select Sector Index while IFRA tracks the NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLI returned 12.26%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for IFRA. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IFRA.
Performance
XLI vs. IFRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than IFRA's 16.86% return.
XLI
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
IFRA
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 28.44%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
XLI vs. IFRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 12.52% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -12.64% |
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 16.86% | 15.90% | 17.02% | 13.42% | -3.32% | 29.81% | 7.37% | 27.00% | -8.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and IFRA is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XLI and IFRA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLI vs. IFRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
IFRA
Industrials
Utilities
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
XLI
IFRA
Utilities
XLI
IFRA
Technology
XLI
IFRA
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
IFRA
Basic Materials
XLI
-
IFRA
Communication Services
XLI
-
IFRA
-
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
IFRA
Energy
XLI
-
IFRA
Financial Services
XLI
-
IFRA
-
Healthcare
XLI
-
IFRA
-
Real Estate
XLI
-
IFRA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. IFRA — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
IFRA
XLI vs. IFRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.33 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.40 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 12.70 | -5.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.94 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.73 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.63 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XLI vs. IFRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than IFRA's maximum drawdown of -41.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and IFRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -41.06% | -21.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -8.40% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -19.93% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -19.93% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -2.66% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.21% | -5.14% | -4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.25% | +0.82% |
Volatility
XLI vs. IFRA - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | IFRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 4.89% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.79% | 11.32% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 14.79% | +0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.42% | 17.92% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 21.38% | -1.40% |
XLI vs. IFRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IFRA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLI vs. IFRA - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than IFRA's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFRA iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF | 1.59% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and IFRA have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFRA has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to XLI (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs IFRA's -41.06%.
On 5-year performance, IFRA leads with 13.03% vs 12.26% for XLI. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IFRA has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.18% for XLI.
XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while IFRA tracks NYSE FactSet U.S. Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.30% for IFRA.
IFRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and IFRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer