XLI vs. ICSH
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. XLI is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 13.86%/yr vs 2.77%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.
Performance
XLI vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than ICSH's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 13.86%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 12.25%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
XLI vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 12.25% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.43% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and ICSH is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2013 | 0.05 |
The correlation between XLI and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLI vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLI
ICSH
Industrials
-
Utilities
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
XLI
ICSH
-
Utilities
XLI
ICSH
Technology
XLI
ICSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLI
ICSH
-
Basic Materials
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Communication Services
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Consumer Defensive
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Energy
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Financial Services
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Healthcare
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Real Estate
XLI
-
ICSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
ICSH
XLI vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 6.56 | -5.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 43.67 | -41.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 288.81 | -281.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 11.01 | -9.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 7.62 | -6.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 2.63 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 1.93 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
XLI vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -3.94% | -58.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -0.10% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -0.10% | -18.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -0.73% | -20.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -3.94% | -38.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.67% | -0.02% | -2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -0.08% | -9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 0.01% | +3.07% |
Volatility
XLI vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.15%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 0.15% | +3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.84% | 0.30% | +12.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 0.39% | +15.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 0.48% | +16.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 1.06% | +18.93% |
XLI vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLI and ICSH have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLI vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.18% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and ICSH have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to ICSH (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 13.86% vs 2.77% for ICSH. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 2.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLI and ICSH have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.18% for XLI.
XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.01 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer