XLI vs. FCFAX
XLI (Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund) and FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) are both funds - XLI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Industrial Select Sector Index, while FCFAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds. Over the past 10 years, XLI returned 14.15%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for FCFAX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLI charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FCFAX.
Performance
XLI vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 13.90% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 14.15%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
XLI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 13.90%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.93%
- 10Y*
- 14.15%
FCFAX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
XLI vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 13.90% | 19.35% | 17.31% | 18.13% | -5.57% | 21.08% | 10.91% | 29.08% | -13.25% | 23.98% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 1.58% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 6.95% | 0.89% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLI and FCFAX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.15 |
The correlation between XLI and FCFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLI vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank
XLI
FCFAX
XLI vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLI | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.65 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.82 | 9.89 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLI vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and FCFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLI | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.26% | -16.33% | -45.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.21% | -1.82% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -2.82% | -15.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.64% | -10.49% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -16.33% | -26.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | 0.00% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -1.53% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 0.49% | +2.60% |
Volatility
XLI vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 6.22% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLI | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 0.77% | +5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.59% | 1.76% | +11.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.17% | 2.27% | +13.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 2.77% | +14.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 3.24% | +16.80% |
XLI vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLI vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than FCFAX's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 6.15% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
XLI Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.16% | 1.29% | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.63% | 1.25% | 1.55% | 1.94% | 2.15% | 1.77% | 2.07% | 2.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLI and FCFAX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLI has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FCFAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.
FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLI and FCFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer