PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLI vs. BIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLI vs. BIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLI achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than BIL's 1.49% return. Over the past 10 years, XLI has outperformed BIL with an annualized return of 13.99%, while BIL has yielded a comparatively lower 2.18% annualized return.


XLI

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.80%
YTD
12.52%
6M
13.57%
1Y
22.72%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
13.99%

BIL

1D
0.02%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLI vs. BIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
12.52%19.35%17.31%18.13%-5.57%21.08%10.91%29.08%-13.25%23.98%
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.49%4.15%5.19%4.94%1.40%-0.10%0.40%2.03%1.74%0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XLI and BIL is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLI vs. BIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLI
XLI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
XLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BIL
BIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
BIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
BIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLI vs. BIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) and SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLIBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-171.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

87.91

-86.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

355.35

-353.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.41

2,817.77

-2,810.36

XLI vs. BIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLI Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the BIL Sharpe Ratio of 19.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLI and BIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLIBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

19.71

-18.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

13.16

-12.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

8.52

-7.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

2.78

-2.32

Drawdowns

XLI vs. BIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLI drawdown since its inception was -62.26%, which is greater than BIL's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLI and BIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLIBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.26%

-0.78%

-61.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.21%

-0.01%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-0.01%

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-0.10%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.33%

-0.21%

-42.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

0.00%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.21%

-0.26%

-8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

0.00%

+3.07%

Volatility

XLI vs. BIL - Volatility Comparison

Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (BIL) at 0.05%. This indicates that XLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLIBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

0.05%

+4.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

0.13%

+12.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

0.20%

+15.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

0.26%

+17.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.98%

0.26%

+19.72%

XLI vs. BIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BIL's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLI vs. BIL - Dividend Comparison

XLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, less than BIL's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIL
SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.86%4.13%5.03%4.92%1.35%0.00%0.30%2.05%1.66%0.68%0.07%0.00%
XLI
Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.18%1.29%1.44%1.63%1.63%1.25%1.55%1.94%2.15%1.77%2.07%2.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLI and BIL have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLI has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to BIL (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLI dropped -62.26% vs BIL's -0.78%.

On 10-year performance, XLI leads with 13.99% vs 2.18% for BIL. On fees, XLI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLI has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 2.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for BIL.

BIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.18% for XLI.

XLI is categorized as Industrials Equities, while BIL is Government Bonds. XLI tracks Industrial Select Sector Index, while BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLI and 0.14% for BIL.

BIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.71 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLI and BIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer