XLG vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L).

XLG and XLKQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. XLKQ.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. Both XLG and XLKQ.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	-7.18%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	-8.70%	24.49%	41.63%	59.85%	-29.07%	35.05%	42.15%	50.99%	-4.30%	34.14%

Different Trading Currencies

XLG is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a -7.18% return, which is significantly higher than XLKQ.L's -8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 15.72%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.35% annualized return.

XLG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -7.18%
• 6M: -4.55%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 3.65%
• 1M: -2.97%
• YTD: -8.70%
• 6M: -6.79%
• 1Y: 31.11%
• 3Y*: 28.88%
• 5Y*: 18.72%
• 10Y*: 22.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XLG

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

XLKQ.L

Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc

Return for Risk

XLG vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLG	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.30	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.89	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.77	-0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	5.55	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and XLKQ.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLG	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.30	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.81	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	1.07	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	1.03	-0.45

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and XLKQ.L is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.70%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLG	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.39%	-28.74%	-23.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-16.76%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-28.74%	+0.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.46%	-28.74%	-1.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-13.73%	+4.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-5.08%	-2.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	6.21%	-2.67%

Volatility

XLG vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 5.82%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLG	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	6.31%	-0.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	14.96%	-4.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.97%	23.98%	-4.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	23.23%	-4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	22.08%	-3.27%