XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L
XLFQ.L (Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLFQ.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLFQ.L returned 13.02%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLFQ.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLFQ.L achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLFQ.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 13.02%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLFQ.L
- 1D
- 3.26%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLFQ.L Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF | -4.71% | 7.07% | 32.15% | 6.12% | -0.39% | 37.90% | -6.56% | 27.16% | -9.51% | 11.87% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLFQ.L and SPXP.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XLFQ.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLFQ.L
SPXP.L
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLFQ.L
SPXP.L
Technology
XLFQ.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLFQ.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLFQ.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLFQ.L
SPXP.L
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLFQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.52 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 4.11 | -3.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.84 | 15.13 | -14.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLFQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 | 2.78 | -2.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.06 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.10 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.15 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLFQ.L drawdown since its inception was -35.39%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLFQ.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLFQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.39% | -25.46% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.81% | -7.09% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.01% | -20.77% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.01% | -20.77% | +1.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.39% | -25.46% | -9.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.62% | -0.21% | -6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -3.50% | -2.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 1.93% | +3.55% |
Volatility
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Financials Sector UCITS ETF (XLFQ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLFQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLFQ.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 2.65% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.48% | 7.24% | +3.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 10.49% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 14.23% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.14% | 16.22% | +3.92% |
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLFQ.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLFQ.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLFQ.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLFQ.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLFQ.L.
XLFQ.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLFQ.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLFQ.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLFQ.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer