PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. KCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. KCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a 6.82% return, which is significantly lower than KCE's 11.35% return. Over the past 10 years, XLF has underperformed KCE with an annualized return of 13.60%, while KCE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.73% annualized return.


XLF

1D
0.21%
1M
3.31%
6M
8.42%
YTD
6.82%
1Y
13.93%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
10.81%
10Y*
13.60%
ALL TIME*
6.15%

KCE

1D
-0.20%
1M
5.14%
6M
10.60%
YTD
11.35%
1Y
10.35%
3Y*
24.68%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
17.73%
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.37M$2.19M$2.42M
$1.89B$1.89B$1.91B

XLF vs. KCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
6.82%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
11.35%10.76%37.51%32.04%-22.14%40.05%30.82%27.13%-15.63%32.01%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and KCE is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005

0.86

The correlation between XLF and KCE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLF vs. KCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLF
KCE

Financial Services

98.2%
97.2%

Technology

1.6%
2.8%

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLF
98.2%
KCE
97.2%

Technology

XLF
1.6%
KCE
2.8%

Industrials

XLF
0.2%
KCE

-

Basic Materials

XLF

-

KCE

-

Communication Services

XLF

-

KCE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLF

-

KCE

-

Consumer Defensive

XLF

-

KCE

-

Energy

XLF

-

KCE

-

Healthcare

XLF

-

KCE

-

Real Estate

XLF

-

KCE

-

Utilities

XLF

-

KCE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. KCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

KCE
KCE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KCE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KCE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLF vs. KCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLFKCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

0.60

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

1.52

+0.90

XLF vs. KCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the KCE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and KCE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. KCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than KCE's maximum drawdown of -74.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and KCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFKCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-74.00%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-17.44%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-26.31%

+10.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-34.45%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-40.78%

-2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-22.64%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.78%

6.84%

-1.06%

Volatility

XLF vs. KCE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is 3.85%, while SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFKCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

6.36%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.06%

15.60%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

20.59%

-5.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

23.15%

-4.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.07%

22.87%

-0.80%

XLF vs. KCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than KCE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLF vs. KCE - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than KCE's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KCE
SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF
1.62%1.63%1.56%1.82%2.42%1.53%2.20%2.32%2.67%1.95%2.30%2.43%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.39%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLF and KCE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KCE has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to XLF (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs KCE's -74.00%.

On 10-year performance, KCE leads with 17.73% vs 13.60% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, KCE has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for KCE.

KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.39% for XLF.

XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.35% for KCE.

XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and KCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer