PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. IYF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. IYF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's -0.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLF having a 13.33% annualized return and IYF not far ahead at 13.53%.


XLF

1D
1.37%
1M
4.61%
YTD
-2.11%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
6.20%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
13.33%

IYF

1D
1.38%
1M
5.17%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
12.18%
3Y*
21.71%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
13.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
-2.11%14.90%30.56%12.03%-10.59%34.80%-1.74%31.88%-13.06%22.00%
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
-0.19%18.25%31.30%15.32%-11.33%31.60%-1.00%31.86%-9.39%19.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XLF and IYF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000

0.97

The correlation between XLF and IYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLF vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLF
IYF

Financial Services

98.0%
99.0%

Technology

1.8%
0.3%

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLF
98.0%
IYF
99.0%

Technology

XLF
1.8%
IYF
0.3%

Industrials

XLF
0.2%
IYF

-

Basic Materials

XLF

-

IYF

-

Communication Services

XLF

-

IYF

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLF

-

IYF

-

Consumer Defensive

XLF

-

IYF

-

Energy

XLF

-

IYF

-

Healthcare

XLF

-

IYF

-

Real Estate

XLF

-

IYF
0.7%

Utilities

XLF

-

IYF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

IYF
IYF Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYF Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYF Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLFIYFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.15

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.88

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

2.38

-1.30

XLF vs. IYF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the IYF Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLF and IYF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, roughly equal to the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and IYF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFIYFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-79.09%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

-13.88%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-16.60%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

-25.06%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-42.57%

-0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-3.25%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-17.59%

-2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.76%

5.13%

+0.63%

Volatility

XLF vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFIYFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.27%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.26%

11.12%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

14.58%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

19.04%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.17%

20.90%

+1.27%

XLF vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYF's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLF vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, which matches IYF's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYF
iShares U.S. Financials ETF
1.49%1.32%1.29%1.67%1.86%1.27%1.72%1.64%1.90%1.46%1.67%1.66%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.49%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XLF and IYF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IYF has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs IYF's -79.09%.

On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 13.33% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.

XLF and IYF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.49%.

XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.42% for IYF.

IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and IYF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer