XLF vs. IYF
XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) and IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index while IYF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLF returned 13.33%/yr vs 13.53%/yr for IYF. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLF charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYF.
Performance
XLF vs. IYF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than IYF's -0.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLF having a 13.33% annualized return and IYF not far ahead at 13.53%.
XLF
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
IYF
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 12.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.53%
XLF vs. IYF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -2.11% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | -0.19% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and IYF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.97 |
The correlation between XLF and IYF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLF vs. IYF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLF
IYF
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLF
IYF
Technology
XLF
IYF
Industrials
XLF
IYF
-
Basic Materials
XLF
-
IYF
-
Communication Services
XLF
-
IYF
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLF
-
IYF
-
Consumer Defensive
XLF
-
IYF
-
Energy
XLF
-
IYF
-
Healthcare
XLF
-
IYF
-
Real Estate
XLF
-
IYF
Utilities
XLF
-
IYF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. IYF — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
IYF
XLF vs. IYF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLF | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 0.88 | -0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 2.38 | -1.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLF vs. IYF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, roughly equal to the maximum IYF drawdown of -79.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and IYF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -79.09% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -13.88% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -16.60% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -25.06% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | -42.57% | -0.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -3.25% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.01% | -17.59% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.76% | 5.13% | +0.63% |
Volatility
XLF vs. IYF - Volatility Comparison
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) have volatilities of 4.23% and 4.27%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | IYF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 4.27% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 11.12% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 14.58% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.66% | 19.04% | -0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 20.90% | +1.27% |
XLF vs. IYF - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IYF's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLF vs. IYF - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, which matches IYF's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.49% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.49% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, XLF and IYF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IYF has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to XLF (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLF dropped -82.69% vs IYF's -79.09%.
On 10-year performance, IYF leads with 13.53% vs 13.33% for XLF. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYF has performed better with a 13.53% return vs 13.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.
XLF and IYF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.49%.
XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index, while IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.42% for IYF.
IYF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLF and IYF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer