PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLEP.L having a 31.41% return and XSEN.L slightly lower at 30.06%.


XLEP.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
31.41%
6M
28.36%
1Y
47.38%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
10.15%

XSEN.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.61%
YTD
30.06%
6M
28.04%
1Y
45.70%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
21.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLEP.L
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF
31.41%1.41%4.85%-5.07%81.43%53.83%-35.01%5.84%-12.80%
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
30.06%1.87%6.67%-5.89%82.86%50.90%-35.95%5.01%-12.11%

Correlation

The correlation between XLEP.L and XSEN.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.99

The correlation between XLEP.L and XSEN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLEP.L
XSEN.L

Energy

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

XLEP.L
100.0%
XSEN.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Communication Services

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Financial Services

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Healthcare

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Industrials

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Real Estate

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Technology

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Utilities

XLEP.L

-

XSEN.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLEP.L
XLEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

XSEN.L
XSEN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSEN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLEP.LXSEN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.34

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.75

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

8.57

+0.70

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XSEN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLEP.L and XSEN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEP.LXSEN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.92

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.82

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.34

-0.10

Drawdowns

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, roughly equal to the maximum XSEN.L drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and XSEN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEP.LXSEN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.35%

-62.46%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-16.55%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.06%

-23.22%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-24.04%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-9.31%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-17.79%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

5.32%

-0.22%

Volatility

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) have volatilities of 8.92% and 9.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEP.LXSEN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

9.04%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

20.50%

-0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.44%

23.79%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.28%

26.01%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

29.43%

-1.29%

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XSEN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Dividend Comparison

XLEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XLEP.L
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSEN.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
2.08%2.70%2.70%3.24%3.69%3.27%7.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XLEP.L and XSEN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XSEN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSEN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLEP.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.12% for XSEN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and XSEN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer