XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L
XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) and XSEN.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLEP.L returned 21.30%/yr vs 21.37%/yr for XSEN.L. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLEP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSEN.L.
Performance
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XLEP.L having a 31.41% return and XSEN.L slightly lower at 30.06%.
XLEP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 31.41%
- 6M
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- 47.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
XSEN.L
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 28.04%
- 1Y
- 45.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 21.37%
- 10Y*
- —
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 31.41% | 1.41% | 4.85% | -5.07% | 81.43% | 53.83% | -35.01% | 5.84% | -12.80% |
XSEN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D | 30.06% | 1.87% | 6.67% | -5.89% | 82.86% | 50.90% | -35.95% | 5.01% | -12.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLEP.L and XSEN.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.99 |
The correlation between XLEP.L and XSEN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLEP.L
XSEN.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLEP.L
XSEN.L
Basic Materials
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Communication Services
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Financial Services
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Healthcare
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Industrials
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Real Estate
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Technology
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Utilities
XLEP.L
-
XSEN.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLEP.L
XSEN.L
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLEP.L | XSEN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.34 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 2.75 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.27 | 8.57 | +0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLEP.L | XSEN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.92 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.82 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.34 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, roughly equal to the maximum XSEN.L drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and XSEN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLEP.L | XSEN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.35% | -62.46% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.17% | -16.55% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.06% | -23.22% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.16% | -24.04% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.08% | -9.31% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -17.79% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.10% | 5.32% | -0.22% |
Volatility
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XSEN.L) have volatilities of 8.92% and 9.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLEP.L | XSEN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 9.04% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 20.50% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.44% | 23.79% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.28% | 26.01% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.14% | 29.43% | -1.29% |
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than XSEN.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLEP.L vs. XSEN.L - Dividend Comparison
XLEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSEN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSEN.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D | 2.08% | 2.70% | 2.70% | 3.24% | 3.69% | 3.27% | 7.11% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XLEP.L and XSEN.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XSEN.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XSEN.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLEP.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.12% for XSEN.L.
Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and XSEN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer