PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLEP.L vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XLEP.L is traded in GBp, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLEP.L achieves a 31.41% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, XLEP.L has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.15%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.37% annualized return.


XLEP.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
31.41%
6M
28.36%
1Y
47.38%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
10.15%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.14%
YTD
11.32%
6M
10.03%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
15.12%
10Y*
16.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLEP.L
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF
31.41%1.41%4.85%-5.07%81.43%53.83%-35.01%5.84%-13.66%-9.87%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.79%9.43%27.16%20.01%-8.44%30.01%14.85%26.37%1.16%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLEP.L and VOO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014

0.28

The correlation between XLEP.L and VOO shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLEP.L
VOO

Energy

100.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Energy

XLEP.L
100.0%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

XLEP.L

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

XLEP.L

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLEP.L

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLEP.L

-

VOO
4.9%

Financial Services

XLEP.L

-

VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

XLEP.L

-

VOO
8.5%

Industrials

XLEP.L

-

VOO
8.3%

Real Estate

XLEP.L

-

VOO
1.9%

Technology

XLEP.L

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

XLEP.L

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLEP.L vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLEP.L
XLEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLEP.LVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.48

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

3.84

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.27

14.73

-5.46

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLEP.L and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEP.LVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.57

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.96

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.91

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.95

-0.70

Drawdowns

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEP.L drawdown since its inception was -63.35%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEP.L and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEP.LVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.35%

-26.09%

-37.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.17%

-7.66%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.06%

-21.93%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.16%

-21.93%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.35%

-26.09%

-37.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.08%

-0.44%

-7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-3.30%

-13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

2.00%

+3.10%

Volatility

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a higher volatility of 8.92% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.68%. This indicates that XLEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEP.LVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.92%

2.68%

+6.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.87%

8.17%

+11.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.44%

11.46%

+11.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.28%

15.77%

+10.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.14%

18.10%

+10.04%

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLEP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLEP.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

XLEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
XLEP.L
Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLEP.L and VOO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLEP.L.

XLEP.L is categorized as Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLEP.L and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLEP.L and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer