PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.02%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


XLE

1D
1.14%
1M
4.72%
YTD
31.32%
6M
30.37%
1Y
44.35%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
10.02%

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
31.32%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and VTV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and VTV has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLE vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
VTV

Energy

100.0%
8.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.1%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.4%

Financial Services

-

22.3%

Healthcare

-

14.5%

Industrials

-

14.0%

Real Estate

-

2.8%

Technology

-

13.4%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
VTV
8.1%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

VTV
3.1%

Communication Services

XLE

-

VTV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

VTV
9.4%

Financial Services

XLE

-

VTV
22.3%

Healthcare

XLE

-

VTV
14.5%

Industrials

XLE

-

VTV
14.0%

Real Estate

XLE

-

VTV
2.8%

Technology

XLE

-

VTV
13.4%

Utilities

XLE

-

VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLEVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

4.03

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

15.20

-4.61

XLE vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.52

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.82

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.75

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.51

-0.20

Drawdowns

XLE vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-59.27%

-11.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-6.35%

-5.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-14.52%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-17.04%

-9.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-36.78%

-30.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-1.11%

-5.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-7.87%

-10.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

1.68%

+2.52%

Volatility

XLE vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

2.65%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.58%

7.67%

+8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.48%

10.18%

+10.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

13.89%

+12.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

16.68%

+12.90%

XLE vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.56%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and VTV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 10.02% for XLE. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer