XLE vs. VTV
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 10.02%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for VTV. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
XLE vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than VTV's 11.91% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 10.02%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 30.37%
- 1Y
- 44.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
VTV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 6M
- 13.41%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 11.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
XLE vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 31.32% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 11.91% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and VTV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and VTV has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLE vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
VTV
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
VTV
Basic Materials
XLE
-
VTV
Communication Services
XLE
-
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
VTV
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
VTV
Financial Services
XLE
-
VTV
Healthcare
XLE
-
VTV
Industrials
XLE
-
VTV
Real Estate
XLE
-
VTV
Technology
XLE
-
VTV
Utilities
XLE
-
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
VTV
XLE vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.45 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 4.03 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.59 | 15.20 | -4.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 2.52 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.82 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.75 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.51 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
XLE vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -59.27% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -6.35% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -14.52% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -17.04% | -9.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -36.78% | -30.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -1.11% | -5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.98% | -7.87% | -10.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 1.68% | +2.52% |
Volatility
XLE vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.07% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.07% | 2.65% | +4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 7.67% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.48% | 10.18% | +10.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.03% | 13.89% | +12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 16.68% | +12.90% |
XLE vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.87% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.56% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and VTV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 10.02% for XLE. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 10.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer