XLE vs. SOXQ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLE returned 19.94%/yr vs 33.82%/yr for SOXQ. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
XLE vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 28.59% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 86.16% return.
XLE
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 28.59%
- 6M
- 26.16%
- 1Y
- 36.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 7.93%
- 1M
- 12.42%
- YTD
- 86.16%
- 6M
- 77.88%
- 1Y
- 153.11%
- 3Y*
- 54.47%
- 5Y*
- 33.82%
- 10Y*
- —
XLE vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.59% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 3.44% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 86.16% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 25.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and SOXQ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2021 | 0.19 |
The correlation between XLE and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
SOXQ
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLE
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
XLE
-
SOXQ
Healthcare
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Industrials
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Technology
XLE
-
SOXQ
Utilities
XLE
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
SOXQ
XLE vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.59 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 9.88 | -6.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.57 | 35.94 | -27.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -46.01% | -25.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -15.59% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -39.36% | +19.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -46.01% | +19.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.70% | -5.37% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -12.92% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 4.28% | +0.01% |
Volatility
XLE vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 7.22%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 18.87%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | 18.87% | -11.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.80% | 30.66% | -13.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.60% | 36.78% | -16.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.06% | 36.90% | -10.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 36.88% | -7.30% |
XLE vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLE vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SOXQ's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.27% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.61% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and SOXQ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (18.87%) compared to XLE (7.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 5-year performance, SOXQ leads with 33.82% vs 19.94% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 7.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 33.82% return vs 19.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for SOXQ.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.27% for SOXQ.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.19 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer