PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. NBCM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. NBCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 35.03% return, which is significantly higher than NBCM's 26.45% return.


XLE

1D
1.00%
1M
12.76%
6M
18.26%
YTD
35.03%
1Y
40.82%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
23.67%
10Y*
10.52%
ALL TIME*
8.87%

NBCM

1D
0.07%
1M
8.17%
6M
15.69%
YTD
26.45%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.21M$2.59M$2.25M
$1.70B$1.73B$1.97B

XLE vs. NBCM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
35.03%7.88%5.56%-0.63%1.66%
NBCM
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF
26.45%17.45%6.55%-6.41%5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and NBCM is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022

0.55

The correlation between XLE and NBCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. NBCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NBCM
NBCM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NBCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NBCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBCM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLE vs. NBCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLENBCMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.38

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.64

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

8.37

-1.05

XLE vs. NBCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the NBCM Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and NBCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. NBCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than NBCM's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and NBCM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLENBCMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-14.78%

-56.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-14.78%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-14.78%

-5.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.13%

-6.98%

+2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.93%

-4.40%

-13.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.62%

4.65%

+0.97%

Volatility

XLE vs. NBCM - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) at 4.62%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLENBCMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

4.62%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

15.33%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.05%

18.09%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.77%

15.00%

+10.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.57%

15.00%

+14.57%

XLE vs. NBCM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NBCM's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLE vs. NBCM - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than NBCM's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NBCM
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF
6.69%8.46%5.22%4.37%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.55%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and NBCM have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to NBCM (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs NBCM's -14.78%.

On 3-year performance, XLE leads with 14.62% vs 14.54% for NBCM. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, NBCM has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XLE has performed better with a 14.62% return vs 14.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for NBCM.

NBCM has the higher dividend yield at 6.69%, compared with 2.55% for XLE.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while NBCM is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.66% for NBCM.

NBCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and NBCM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer